• Format: ms-word (doc)
  • Pages: 79
  • Chapter 1 to 5
  • With Abstract, Reference, Questionnaire and Appendix
  • Preview abstract and chapter 1 below


Elections and Vote Buying in Kwara State: a Case Study of 2023 General Elections in Offa Local Government


This study investigated the prevalence of vote buying and its impact on electoral integrity during the 2023 general elections in Offa Local Government, Nigeria. A quantitative survey research design was adopted, and a structured questionnaire was designed to collect data from a sample of 120 respondents. The data collected were analyzed using SPSS27, and a t-test was employed to test the hypotheses derived from the research questions. The findings of the study provided significant insights into the forms of vote buying observed. Monetary inducements, promises of future benefits, and transportation services to polling stations were identified as prevalent tactics used during the elections. Socio-economic factors such as poverty and unemployment were also found to contribute significantly to voter susceptibility to vote buying. These findings underscore the complex relationship between economic conditions and electoral behaviour. The study also evaluated the effectiveness of existing anti-vote buying measures. It revealed gaps in enforcement and highlighted the persistence of electoral malpractice despite regulatory efforts. These findings suggest the need for comprehensive reforms to strengthen electoral integrity. In conclusion, this study contributes valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities associated with electoral integrity in Offa Local Government. The recommendations provided emphasize the importance of transparency in campaign financing, empowering electoral management bodies, and fostering public trust in political institutions to combat electoral malpractice effectively. These recommendations have implications not only at the local level but also for informing policy decisions and electoral practices nationally, to strengthen democratic processes and promote citizen participation in electoral affairs.




Background to the Study

Elections play a crucial role in democratic societies as they allow citizens to exercise their right to choose leaders and representatives who will govern on their behalf (Abia, 2020). However, the democratic process in many countries, including Nigeria, is marred by various irregularities that undermine its integrity and fairness. One of the most significant concerns in Nigerian elections is the prevalence of vote buying, where candidates or their agents offer incentives to voters in exchange for their votes (Adamu, Ocheni, & Ibrahim, 2022). This practice poses a serious threat to the credibility and legitimacy of electoral outcomes.

In Kwara State, located in north-central Nigeria, the issue of electoral integrity has been a recurring challenge, especially in Offa Local Government Area (Adeseun, 2017). Despite the efforts of electoral management bodies and civil society organizations to promote free and fair elections, vote buying continues to influence electoral outcomes and erode public trust in the democratic process (Adetoye & Omilusi, 2020). This situation underscores the urgent need to address the root causes of vote buying and strengthen mechanisms for ensuring transparent and accountable elections.

Vote buying takes various forms, including the distribution of cash, gifts, and other incentives to voters by political actors seeking electoral advantage (Akamere, 2021). Such practices not only violate electoral laws but also perpetuate a culture of patronage and clientelism in Nigerian politics (Baidoo, Dankwa, & Eshun, 2018). The allure of immediate benefits often leads voters to prioritize short-term gains over long-term considerations, such as good governance and policy outcomes (Beyer, Knutsen, & Rasch, 2022). This highlights the complex interplay between socioeconomic factors, political dynamics, and electoral behaviour.

The impact of vote buying on electoral outcomes and democratic governance cannot be overstated. It distorts the will of the electorate and undermines the principle of political equality, where each citizen’s vote should carry equal weight (Bratton, 2020). Moreover, it creates barriers to entry for candidates without access to vast resources, perpetuating a system that favours wealthy and influential individuals or parties (Caciagli & Belloni, 2019). Consequently, the quality of representation and accountability in elected offices may be compromised, leading to governance challenges and public disillusionment.

Efforts to combat vote buying require a multi-faceted approach that addresses both supply and demand factors. On the supply side, stringent enforcement of electoral laws and regulations is essential to deter candidates and parties from engaging in illegal practices (Carreras & Irepoglu, 2019). This includes measures such as monitoring campaign financing, sanctioning violators, and enhancing transparency in political funding (Center for Democracy and Development, 2018). Additionally, promoting ethical standards among political actors and fostering a culture of integrity in politics can help reduce the temptation to resort to vote buying (Channels Television, 2018).

Addressing the demand for vote buying involves tackling underlying socioeconomic vulnerabilities that make voters susceptible to inducements. Poverty, lack of access to basic services, and economic insecurity contribute to the vulnerability of marginalized communities to electoral manipulation (Check Market, 2019). Therefore, holistic development policies that address socio-economic inequalities and empower citizens through education, employment opportunities, and social welfare programs can reduce the incentives for vote buying (City Population, 2017).

Public awareness campaigns and civic education initiatives also play a crucial role in combating vote buying (Daily Trust, 2019). By informing citizens about their rights, responsibilities, and the negative consequences of electoral malpractice, these efforts can promote a more informed and vigilant electorate (AuwalAbubkar, MohdMahadee, & Ku Hasnita, 2017). Furthermore, fostering a culture of political participation and civic engagement encourages citizens to prioritize the common good and hold elected officials accountable for their actions (Ayeni-Aleke, 2020).

Statement of Problem

The persistent issue of vote buying in Nigerian elections, as highlighted by Adamu, Ocheni, and Ibrahim (2022), poses a significant threat to the integrity and fairness of the electoral process. Despite efforts to curb this malpractice, gaps remain that need to be addressed to ensure free and fair elections in the country, particularly in regions like Kwara State’s Offa Local Government Area.

One of the key gaps in addressing the problem of vote buying is the limited effectiveness of existing anti-vote buying measures, as noted by Adeseun (2017). While laws and regulations exist to penalize vote buying, enforcement mechanisms often fall short, allowing perpetrators to evade accountability. This lack of stringent enforcement undermines the deterrent effect of anti-vote buying measures and emboldens individuals and political entities to engage in electoral malpractice.

Furthermore, the socio-economic factors contributing to voter susceptibility to vote buying require deeper exploration and targeted interventions (Baidoo, Dankwa, & Eshun, 2018). Poverty, unemployment, and lack of access to essential services create conditions where voters may be more inclined to accept inducements in exchange for their votes. Addressing these underlying socio-economic vulnerabilities is crucial for reducing the demand for vote buying and promoting a more equitable and participatory electoral process.

Another gap lies in the need for enhanced civic education and awareness campaigns (Daily Trust, 2019). Many voters, especially in marginalized communities, may not fully understand their rights, the implications of vote buying, and the importance of their role in ensuring electoral integrity. Strengthening civic education initiatives can empower citizens to make informed decisions, resist external pressures, and actively contribute to safeguarding the democratic process.

Additionally, the role of technology and innovation in combating vote buying remains an area for exploration (Birch, 2020). Leveraging digital platforms for voter education, monitoring campaign financing, and enhancing transparency in political processes can provide new tools to detect and deter electoral malpractice. However, the effective implementation and integration of technology into electoral systems require careful planning, resources, and stakeholder collaboration.

Objectives of the Study

The following specific objectives were investigated:

  1. To investigate the prevalence and forms of vote buying during the 2023 general elections in Offa Local Government.
  2. To identify the factors contributing to the susceptibility of voters to vote buying in the studied area.
  3. To assess the effectiveness of existing anti-vote buying measures in curbing electoral malpractice.

Research Questions

The following research questions were examined:

  1. What were the prevalent forms of vote buying observed during the 2023 general elections in Offa Local Government?
  2. What socio-economic and political factors made voters susceptible to vote buying?
  3. How effective were the measures implemented to deter and punish vote buying during the elections?

Research Hypotheses

The following hypotheses were tested in this study:

Null Hypotheses(H0):

  1. There is no significant prevalence of monetary inducements as a form of vote buying during the 2023 general elections in Offa Local Government.
  2. Socio-economic factors such as poverty and unemployment do not contribute to the susceptibility of voters to vote buying in the studied area.
  3. Existing anti-vote buying measures are not insufficient to effectively deter and punish electoral malpractice in Offa Local Government during the 2023 elections.

Alternative Hypotheses(H1):

  1. There is a significant prevalence of monetary inducements as a form of vote buying during the 2023 general elections in Offa Local Government.
  2. Socio-economic factors such as poverty and unemployment contribute to the susceptibility of voters to vote buying in the studied area.
  3. Existing anti-vote buying measures are insufficient to effectively deter and punish electoral malpractice in Offa Local Government during the 2023 elections.

Significance of the Study

The significance of studying elections and vote buying in Kwara State, with a focus on the 2023 general elections in Offa Local Government, extends beyond academic curiosity to practical implications for democracy, governance, and social development in Nigeria.

Firstly, this study holds significant importance in understanding and addressing electoral malpractice, particularly vote buying, which has been a persistent challenge in Nigerian politics. By examining the specific context of Offa Local Government Area in Kwara State, researchers can gain insights into the dynamics, prevalence, and forms of vote buying in a localized setting. This understanding is crucial for policymakers, election monitoring bodies, and civil society organizations in designing targeted interventions and policy reforms to enhance electoral integrity and fairness.

Secondly, the study’s findings can contribute to enhancing democratic processes and strengthening the rule of law in Nigeria. By identifying the factors contributing to voter susceptibility to vote buying, such as socio-economic disparities and lack of civic awareness, interventions can be designed to address these root causes. This can include targeted education and empowerment programs for voters, as well as measures to improve transparency and accountability in campaign financing and political activities.

Thirdly, the study’s focus on the 2023 general elections provides timely and relevant insights into the evolving landscape of Nigerian politics. Elections are pivotal moments in democratic transitions, and understanding the dynamics of vote buying during such periods can shed light on broader trends and challenges facing the electoral process. This knowledge can inform future election management strategies, electoral reforms, and anti-corruption initiatives aimed at promoting democratic values and good governance.

Moreover, the significance of this study extends to its potential impact on public discourse and awareness regarding electoral integrity and civic responsibilities. By disseminating the research findings through academic publications, policy briefs, and public engagement activities, the study can contribute to raising awareness among citizens about the importance of free and fair elections, the dangers of electoral malpractice, and the role of informed and active citizenship in shaping democratic outcomes.

Additionally, the study’s focus on a specific geographic area like Offa Local Government can provide insights into localized political dynamics, community-level perceptions of elections, and the influence of local actors and power structures on electoral processes. This micro-level analysis is valuable for understanding the complexities of Nigerian politics beyond national-level narratives and broad generalizations.

Scope of the Study

The study focuses on the 2023 general elections in Offa Local Government Area of Kwara State, Nigeria. It examines the prevalence and forms of vote buying, factors influencing voter susceptibility, and the effectiveness of anti-vote buying measures within this specific electoral context.

Operational Definition of Terms

Vote Buying: The act of offering incentives, such as money or gifts, to voters in exchange for their votes.

Electoral Malpractice: Any illegal or unethical behaviour that compromises the integrity of electoral processes.

Prevalence: The extent or frequency of occurrence of a particular phenomenon within a defined population or area.

Susceptibility: The degree to which individuals or groups are vulnerable or likely to be influenced by external factors, such as vote buying.

Anti-Vote Buying Measures: Strategies, policies, or actions aimed at preventing, detecting, and penalizing vote buying during elections.

Democratic Processes: The principles, practices, and institutions that uphold democratic governance, including free and fair elections.

Policymakers: Individuals or groups responsible for formulating and implementing policies at various levels of government or organizations.

Civil Society Organizations: Non-governmental entities that operate independently of the government and often advocate for public interests and social change.



  • Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2022). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13-22. Retrieved from http://www.ualberta.ca/~ijqm\
  • Pannucci, C. J., & Wilkins, E. G. (2020). Identifying and avoiding bias in research. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 126(2), 619–625. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de24bc
  • Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research Methods for Business Students (7th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.
  • Sreedharan, J., Chandrasekharan, S., & Gopakumar, A. (2019). Optimum sample size in cross-sectional studies. International Journal of Scientific Research Papers in Mathematics and Statistics, 6(1), 122–130.
  • Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2021). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd


Do you need help? Talk to us right now: (+234) 08060082010, 08107932631 (Call/WhatsApp). Email: [email protected].


Disclaimer: This PDF Material Content is Developed by the copyright owner to Serve as a RESEARCH GUIDE for Students to Conduct Academic Research.

You are allowed to use the original PDF Research Material Guide you will receive in the following ways:

1. As a source for additional understanding of the project topic.

2. As a source for ideas for you own academic research work (if properly referenced).

3. For PROPER paraphrasing ( see your school definition of plagiarism and acceptable paraphrase).

4. Direct citing ( if referenced properly).

Thank you so much for your respect for the authors copyright.

Do you need help? Talk to us right now: (+234) 08060082010, 08107932631 (Call/WhatsApp). Email: [email protected].

Welcome! My name is Damaris I am online and ready to help you via WhatsApp chat. Let me know if you need my assistance.