Assessment of the Performance of the State Security Network in Selected States of Southwest Nigeria Case Study of Amotekun in Lagos State
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study
Crime in society is viewed as one of the most factual occurrences which confronts people in this modern age (Giddens, 2004). Ehindero, Inspector General of Police stated in a lecture delivered to Participants of National War College, Abuja that ‘perhaps the most potent threat to the national security of any country is a crime. Ugwuoke (2010) pointed out that crime and criminality are as old as mankind. Marshall (2008) revealed that crime is a global feature of all human societies. The reason for this according to Marshall is because there is no human society where norms and values are not violated, from the simplest hunting and gathering societies to the most complex civilized societies. It is because of this universal character of crime that every society is expected to have ‘specific mechanisms for the overall interest and wellbeing of the generality of the populace’ (Igbo, 2007).
Ezuugwu (2011) noted that Nigerian society is taking a dangerous path, a path to nowhere (crime leads to nowhere but destruction), and a path to destruction. That the society is really adrift, a regrettable drift, sustained by a wave of criminality and lawlessness. That Nigerians these days sleep with one eye closed because of the fear of the rampaging effects of armed robbery and other associated crimes. Each day comes with its stories of one form of crime or the other. Every society gets the kind of criminal it deserves because society prepares the crime while the criminals commit it. Failure of the government to meet up with its basic duties of meeting the primary needs of the citizen, criminal activities keep increasing in the society.
Alemika and Chukwuma (2000) noted that as a result of police inefficiency and ineffectiveness in crime prevention and control, detection and apprehension of criminals, poor rule of law records, the violation of human rights, lack of accountability, incivility, and wide-scale corruption, the public holds the police in low esteem and is fearful of their brutality, extortion, and ineffectiveness. The public loss of trust and confidence in the police and in the state, in the face of an unrelenting upsurge in violent crimes in the society, necessitated the advent and formation of informal policing strategies, otherwise known as vigilantism or neighborhood watch (Abrahansen& Williams, 2005). Increasing attention has been given to informal policing, and it is seen as a rational response of poor communities to the weak criminal justice system, with regard to low policing and high levels of criminality (Adewale, 2007). Despite this development, the nation still finds it difficult to integrate the activities of the informal police sector into mainstream policing in Nigeria.
The most frequently recorded mechanism by which vigilante and neighborhood watch is supposed to reduce crime is by arresting anyone with suspicious activities and reporting these to the police. The relationship between reporting and crime reduction is not always well explained in the literature. More so, it has been argued that close surveillance might prevent crime as a result of its effect on the views and decision-making of potential offenders. Hence, watching and reporting might deter offenders if they are aware of the propensity of the local residents to report suspicious behavior and if they perceive this as increasing the risks of being caught.
Consequently, vigilante/neighborhood watch can be an option that can enhance the effectiveness of the police force in Nigeria. Neighborhood watch is perhaps the most popular and most demanded policing method among the law enforcement agencies, and has been implemented by many countries including the United States, Germany, and India. In the United States, where neighborhood watch practices started with decentralized police systems, neighborhood watch is accepted as a philosophy and practice that has been recognized as the most important contemporary police innovation designed to reduce crime and ensure effective policing (Zhoe, 2003).
Regional policing as a crime reduction approach is a security system in which members of the public are involved in the conduct of protecting their territories to aid the efforts of the police in crime control by supplying useful information to law enforcement agencies in the neighborhood (Eke, 2009). In regional policing, the community is always expected to involving in the policing duty through volunteer schemes, establishing neighborhood support systems, and augmenting police patrol activities.
Strong communities are relatively linked to the prevention of crime and reduction of fear of crime(Giddens, 2004). Without sustained public contact, officers would be unable to exercise their discretion appropriately and would find themselves isolated, increasingly hostile, and unable to empathize with the public. In view of this, seven senior officers from the Nigerian police 2003 went to U.K and U.S.A respectively to do a comparative study of community policing (Anucha, 2007). It was launched on the 27th day of April 2004 by the Inspector-General of Police TafaBalogun during the era of President Olusegun Obasanjo’s administration.
A significant task that is important for the police to achieve success in guaranteeing the security of life and property of the citizens in the country is to secure the support and understanding of individuals and communities. Therefore, the role performed by the non-state actors such as the traditional rulers, religious leaders, and other members of the community in crime detection, prevention, and reduction for the achievement of security cannot be underestimated (Adeyefa, 2012). Scholars have postulated that when the Nigeria Police Forceworkclosely with the community, people or locals, they would be able to curb crime and criminality in their respective areas of jurisdiction. It is on these premises that this study seeks to examine regional policing and crime reduction in Nigeria by using Amotekun as a case study.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Crime is no doubt one of the major social challenges confronting Nigeria today. The manifestation of this is evident in that no day passes without the national dailies carrying reports of one form of crime or the other, ranging from murder, forcible rape, aggravated assault, child sexual abuse, herdsmen killings, political assassination, kidnapping, armed robbery, burglary, motor vehicle theft, oil pipeline explosion/bunkering by the militant’s groups, issues of bombings by Boko Haram, cybercrimes and child trafficking. For example, reports abound of armed robbers using dynamites and hand grenades to blow up the doors of bullion vans conveying money with a full police escort or using rocket-propelled grenades to attack helicopters (Soyombo, 2009). Similarly, kidnapping which used to be a localized problem in some communities in Nigeria has assumed a national character, now, targeting the rich and the powerful that are now living in grave fear and uncertainty.
As a response to the security challenges in the country, many communities and neighborhoods as well as governments, have made increasing recourse, to formal and informal security providers, such as community policing, Community Based Security/Neighbourhood Watch/Vigilante, and the recently formed by the south western Governors; Amotekun group structures to improve their safety and security conditions. Reports indicate that as high as 50% of Nigerians patronize the services of these community-based security operatives for their protection from criminal attacks (Alemika and Chukwuma, 2005).
Some of the states in Nigeria, particularly, the south western state governments have openly endorsed armed vigilante groups called Amotekun as part of their campaign against crime. Recently, the south western Governors were reported to have encouraged various stakeholders in their states to support the formation of Amotekun in the light of the frequent invasion of their territories by kidnappers, and armed robbers and also to curb the excesses of the herdsmen disturbing the peace of the farmers and other dwellers in their various communities. It is against this backdrop that the delivery of safety and security is considered a justifiable public service to be provided by the joint efforts of the communities and state (Lubuva, 2004).
1.3 Objectives of the Study
The objective of this study is to examine regional policing and crime reduction in Nigeria by using Amotekun as a case study. However, the specific objectives are:
- To investigate the level of acceptance of regional policing by the people in the community
- To determine the challenges facing regional policing in Nigeria
- To examine the prevalence of regional policing in Nigeria
1.4 Research Questions
The following questions were generated during the course of this study:
- What is the level of acceptance of regional policing by the people in the community?
- What are the challenges facing regional policing in Nigeria?
- What is the prevalence of regional policing in Nigeria?
1.5 Significance of the Study
The study has both theoretical and practical significance. Theoretically, regional policing has not received adequate research in Africa and especially in Nigeria compared to the extensive research that has been carried out in the United States and the United Kingdom. This study will be theoretically significant because its findings will help to close the gap created by the lack of existing literature on community policing as a strategy for crime reduction in Nigeria. It will be an addition to the body of existing sociological, criminological, and criminal justice literature, particularly in the area of crime reduction strategies. It will also stimulate further research on regional policing in this part of sub-Sahara Africa, and Nigeria in particular. Practically, the study will also draw the attention of the police to the need to strengthen their relationship with the members of the community where they are working, for effective crime reduction. The findings of this study will help South Westerners in particular and Nigeria Government at large to plan on how to improve regional policing. The findings will also help the general public to understand how regional policing enhances or lowers effective crime control when properly applied. Finally, the outcome of the study will no doubt help in the prevention of crime and social disorder, and be a useful material to research students of criminology, law, law enforcement agents, and public administrators for a crime-free society.
1.6 Scope of the Study
This study on regional policing and crime reduction in Nigeria: a case study of Amotekun in the Southwestern part of Nigeria will be carried out in three states namely: Oyo, Ekiti, and the Ondo States. It is believed that the Governors of these states are the forces behind the establishment of this security agency. Therefore, the people of these states will be selected for this study.
1.7 Limitation of the study
Major problems encountered were time constraints, validity, and reliability of the sources or materials. The researcher was faced with the problem of meeting with the security agents like the Nigeria Police, Vigilante group, Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps, and the likes as they were not willing to give adequate information needed for this research
1.8 Definition of Terms
The following basic concepts are operationalized for easy comprehension of the study: Regional Policing: It is a collaborative effort between the police and the members of the public to identify the problems of crime and disorder and to develop solutions from within the community in crime reduction.
Crime: Crime in this study means any action which contravenes the laws established by political authority.
Crime Control: In this study, crime control is the means of solving crime problems, arresting suspects, and processing and incapacitating offenders by the members of society, agents, and the criminal justice system.
Crime Fighting Policing: This is the kind of policing that does not need the collaboration of the member of the society in crime control/fight but solely depend on themselves to dictate and control crime example is the police we have during the military era.
Crime Prevention: In this study, it is the present interventions in stopping future crime.
Crime Reduction: It is all the effort from the people and the government to reduce the rate of crime in a given society.
Do you need help? Talk to us right now: (+234) 08060082010, 08107932631 (Call/WhatsApp). Email: [email protected].IF YOU CAN'T FIND YOUR TOPIC, CLICK HERE TO HIRE A WRITER»
